Skip to main content

Occupational diversity in Canada's Parliament???

Another update to material that is presented in the women and politics text I'm currently revising. For some reason this was more than a pain to do than I thought it would be. The major problem is how parliamentarians report their previous occupations varies quite a bit from how Statistics Canada categorizes occupations in Canada. This required a fair amount of interpretation of where the MPs' self-description would fit in the statistical categories. The second problem is that the categories are  remarkably broad, for example the business, finance and administration occupations run a range from bank tellers and clerical administration to bank owners and finance capitalists. It is interesting to note that as a whole this category in Canada as a whole skews towards women's participation, possibly a testimony to the feminization of the FIRE industries, i.e., Finance, Insurance and Real Estate. What the chart does indicate is how MP's both male and female are drawn from professional occupations rather than non-professional occupations like retail sales. MPs' tend to be drawn from the legal, business, government service professions. This doesn't particularly match the occupational breakdown of Canadian society as a whole.

 A Comparison of Occupations and MPs’ Previous Occupations, January 2018
% of Canadian women employed in this occupation, 2017
% of women MPs employed in this occupation, occupation, 42nd Parliament
Occupation WOMEN

Management
6.7
12.9
Business, finance and administration
22.8
14.1
Natural sciences/engineering/mathematics
3.7
2.3
Professional Occupation in law, social, community and government services
3.7
21.1
Para professional occupation in legal social, community and education
4.7
12.9
Professional occupations in education services
5.6
12.9
Occupations in frontline public protection services
0.2
2.3
Professional Occupations in health (except nursing)
2.3
4.7
Nursing
3.5
4.7
Artistic/literary/journalist
3.4
7.0
Sales and service
28.6
1.1
Natural resources, agriculture and related production occupations
0.73
-
Trades, transport, and construction
2.0
-
Processing, manufacturing, and utilities
2.7
1.1

 % of Canadian men employed in this occupation, 2017
% of men MPs employed in this occupation, 42nd Parliament
Occupation MEN


Management
11.6
8.6
Business and finance
9.4
14.3
Natural sciences/engineering/mathematics
11.3
4.5
Professional Occupation in law and social community and government services
1.9
29.1
Para professional occupation in legal social, community and education
0.6
3.3
Professional occupations in education services
2.3
13.9
Occupations in frontline public protection services
0.92
6.6
Professional Occupations in health (except nursing)
1.4
1.2
Nursing
0.36
-
Artistic/literary/journalism
2.8
10.2
Sales and service
18.8
0.4
Natural resources, agriculture and related production occupations – inc. faming
3.1
8.2
Trades, transport, and construction
25.4
3.3
Processing, manufacturing, and utilities
6.5
0.4

 Sources: Statistics Canada (2017); Library of Parliament, Parliamentarians, https://lop.parl.ca/sites/ParlInfo/default/en_CA/People/parliamentarians http://www.parl.gc.ca,

<End table>

Statistics Canada. Table 282-0142 Labour Force Survey Estimates (LFS) by National Occupation Classification (NOC) and sex, annual. CANSIM. Accessed February 4, 2018 & Library of Parliament, Parliamentarians. https://lop.parl.ca/sites/ParlInfo/default/en_CA/People/parliamentarians. Accessed February 1, 2018


 Now having spent two days working on this, I'm not sure how important it is to include in the chapter and might go with a more generalized breakdown from Samara Canada, that interestingly points out how there has been a rise in self-identified "farmers" in the House of Commons.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is Low Voter Turnout Actually A Good Thing?

 [It's a provocative position. I hope my answer is a bit more nuanced. Thinking with a pen, so the views are my own and likely to change as I think about it a bit more.] The big talking point regarding yesterday's municipal election in London is the free fall debacle in voter turnout. Only 25.5% of eligible voters cast a ballot, a significant plunge from the 40% turnout in 2018 (the BRT election) and from the 2014 high of 43% (the get rid of Fontana and the Fontana 8 election).  This low turnout is seen as the reason for the rather surprising outcomes in some of the words, namely the defeat of three "incumbents."* Incumbents are considered safe bets because they have name recognition and represent the status quo for voters. Generally, the mass of voters in municipal election have little to guide their votes other than name recognition and a desire not to change things up. However, when that "mass" of voters decides not to show up, that generalized support fo...
Post a Comment
Read more

The State of Gender Parity in 2019

On December 16, the World Economic Forum (WEF) released its Global Gender Index for 2020 based on 2019 country performance. Canada has dropped 3 places in the ranking since the last report a year ago.  Since 2006 the WEF has produced annual reports on the progress made toward gender equality using benchmarks based on four thematic dimensions: economic participation and opportunity, educational attainment, health and survival, and political empowerment. In the latest edition of Women, Politics and Public Policy: The political struggles of Canadian women, (Newman, White and Findlay, 2020, p. 389) we had this to say of the 2017 report:  According to the 2017 report, no country has fully closed its gender gap; four of the five Nordic countries, Rwanda (4th), and Nicaragua (6th) have closed more than 80 per cent of their gaps. And Canada? Canada does not crack the top ten; it ranks 16th out of 144 countries, which is 2 points lower than its first ranking in 2006. This d...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ur-Fascism: The anti-democratic impulse of Trump's populism

Ur-Fascism: Trump’s Anti-Democratic Populism The King's Hour: Panel Discussion on “The Problem with Trump” King’s University College at Western, September 27, 2017. I have been agonizing for the past week as to what I would say in this address, not because I have nothing to say but because I have too much. How do I frame this in a way to outline coherently my angst beyond a performance of Edvard Munch’s The Scream .   As this is the beginning of the school year, in class we focus on first principles or concepts, so it makes sense for me to return to first principles. First, as a common principle, it is safe to say that Nazi’s are bad. The question this raises though, is why are we even having a conversation where we have to preface our remarks with a reminder that Nazis are bad? We are having this conversation because Donald Trump is a “charismatic populist.” Populism can be a progressive force of democracy when viewed in terms of participatory engagement ...
Post a Comment
Read more