Skip to main content

Occupational diversity in Canada's Parliament???

Another update to material that is presented in the women and politics text I'm currently revising. For some reason this was more than a pain to do than I thought it would be. The major problem is how parliamentarians report their previous occupations varies quite a bit from how Statistics Canada categorizes occupations in Canada. This required a fair amount of interpretation of where the MPs' self-description would fit in the statistical categories. The second problem is that the categories are  remarkably broad, for example the business, finance and administration occupations run a range from bank tellers and clerical administration to bank owners and finance capitalists. It is interesting to note that as a whole this category in Canada as a whole skews towards women's participation, possibly a testimony to the feminization of the FIRE industries, i.e., Finance, Insurance and Real Estate. What the chart does indicate is how MP's both male and female are drawn from professional occupations rather than non-professional occupations like retail sales. MPs' tend to be drawn from the legal, business, government service professions. This doesn't particularly match the occupational breakdown of Canadian society as a whole.

 A Comparison of Occupations and MPs’ Previous Occupations, January 2018
% of Canadian women employed in this occupation, 2017
% of women MPs employed in this occupation, occupation, 42nd Parliament
Occupation WOMEN

Management
6.7
12.9
Business, finance and administration
22.8
14.1
Natural sciences/engineering/mathematics
3.7
2.3
Professional Occupation in law, social, community and government services
3.7
21.1
Para professional occupation in legal social, community and education
4.7
12.9
Professional occupations in education services
5.6
12.9
Occupations in frontline public protection services
0.2
2.3
Professional Occupations in health (except nursing)
2.3
4.7
Nursing
3.5
4.7
Artistic/literary/journalist
3.4
7.0
Sales and service
28.6
1.1
Natural resources, agriculture and related production occupations
0.73
-
Trades, transport, and construction
2.0
-
Processing, manufacturing, and utilities
2.7
1.1

 % of Canadian men employed in this occupation, 2017
% of men MPs employed in this occupation, 42nd Parliament
Occupation MEN


Management
11.6
8.6
Business and finance
9.4
14.3
Natural sciences/engineering/mathematics
11.3
4.5
Professional Occupation in law and social community and government services
1.9
29.1
Para professional occupation in legal social, community and education
0.6
3.3
Professional occupations in education services
2.3
13.9
Occupations in frontline public protection services
0.92
6.6
Professional Occupations in health (except nursing)
1.4
1.2
Nursing
0.36
-
Artistic/literary/journalism
2.8
10.2
Sales and service
18.8
0.4
Natural resources, agriculture and related production occupations – inc. faming
3.1
8.2
Trades, transport, and construction
25.4
3.3
Processing, manufacturing, and utilities
6.5
0.4

 Sources: Statistics Canada (2017); Library of Parliament, Parliamentarians, https://lop.parl.ca/sites/ParlInfo/default/en_CA/People/parliamentarians http://www.parl.gc.ca,

<End table>

Statistics Canada. Table 282-0142 Labour Force Survey Estimates (LFS) by National Occupation Classification (NOC) and sex, annual. CANSIM. Accessed February 4, 2018 & Library of Parliament, Parliamentarians. https://lop.parl.ca/sites/ParlInfo/default/en_CA/People/parliamentarians. Accessed February 1, 2018


 Now having spent two days working on this, I'm not sure how important it is to include in the chapter and might go with a more generalized breakdown from Samara Canada, that interestingly points out how there has been a rise in self-identified "farmers" in the House of Commons.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Women Running in Ontario 2018

I started this blog back in 2014 after the Ontario election by discussing the number of women who ran and their success. This time I'm ahead o the ball, so today I'm giving you the lowdown on how many women are running, for which parties and where. Earlier this week, in honour of Mothers' Day, Andrea Horwath announced that more than 50% of the NDPs candidates were women (69 of 124 or 55.6%) ( http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/ndp-liberals-pcs-women-election-voters-1.4661203 ). She praised the NDP for insuring that gender equity principles are part of the nomination process. To their credit the other mainstream parties have all increased the number of women running, this is even with the addition of 17 new ridings in this election. The percentage of women running for the Liberals has increased by 10% and the Progressive Conservatives have increased their number by 8%. The Greens come closest to the NDP running women in 64 of 125 ridings, according to a count of their w...
2 comments
Read more

This time: Employment Statistics Part Time Full Time Work

The end of term is always a difficult time to get any writing done, which is a problem because I'm on a deadline. However, I did manage to hive off a little time from marking and dealing with student queries to compile the following statistics on Part Time and Full Time work and how it is distributed by gender. This is drawn from Statistics Canada Labour Force Survey characteristics and the U.S Bureau of Labor, Labour Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey. It's for a piece I'm working on about the gendered nature of work in Canada and the U.S. Table 1. Canada Female and Male Employment F ull Time and Part Time Percentage of working population by gender Years Employment total (thousands) Part Time Full Time Female Male Female Male Female Male 2007 7477.7 8185.6 25.4 10.1 74.6 90.0 2008 7541.1 8254.8 25.6 10.4 74.4 90.0...
2 comments
Read more

Hillary Clinton – An unreliable victim of rape culture

A few weeks ago, I re-posted an article about how this year’s American Presidential election was a referendum on male entitlement. Well we now have our answer. While Clinton ‘won’ the popular vote, the low turnout of democratic voters, the overall vote in the mid-west and industrial swing states, and the willingness of a substantial number of women (42% of women voters according to the Pew Research Center Facttank) who voted for Trump indicates a significant plurality of American voters are comfortable enough with male entitlement to support a man who has historically and consistently imposed himself on women’s bodies without their consent. This raises the question of why a substantial portion of a society is willing to accept a rapist and serial sexual abuser in the highest office over a woman career politician. Part of the explanation certainly is the prevalence of a rape culture in the United States. Wikipedia is quite clear in its definition of rape culture; “a setting in w...
1 comment
Read more