Skip to main content

This time: Employment Statistics Part Time Full Time Work

The end of term is always a difficult time to get any writing done, which is a problem because I'm on a deadline. However, I did manage to hive off a little time from marking and dealing with student queries to compile the following statistics on Part Time and Full Time work and how it is distributed by gender. This is drawn from Statistics Canada Labour Force Survey characteristics and the U.S Bureau of Labor, Labour Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey. It's for a piece I'm working on about the gendered nature of work in Canada and the U.S.

Table 1. Canada

Female and Male Employment Full Time and Part Time

Percentage of working population by gender


Years
Employment total (thousands)
Part Time
Full Time

Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
2007
7477.7
8185.6
25.4
10.1
74.6
90.0
2008
7541.1
8254.8
25.6
10.4
74.4
90.0
2009
7480.4
7942.6
26.1
11.3
73.9
89.1
2010
7528.8
8035.7
26.1
10.9
73.5
89.1
2011
7581.1
8164.3
25.9
11.1
74.1
89.1
2012
7650.8
8230.5
25.6
10.7
74.4
88.9
2013
7735.1
8290.2
25.5
10.9
74.6
89.3
2014
7729.9
8322.7
26.1
10.9
74.3
89.0
2015
7747.7
8382.5
25.1
10.8
74.9
89.1
2016
7805.8
8373.4
24.9
11.2
75.1
88.8
2017
7917.1
8500.2
24.7
11.4
75.3
88.6

Table 2. United States

Female-Male Employment Full Time and Part Time

Percentage of working population by gender



Years
Employment total (thousands)
Part Time
Full Time

Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male







2007
74,115
83,538
26.4
12.6
73.6
87.4
2008
74,363
83,109
27.8
14.0
72.2
86.0
2009
72,855
81,073
28.5
15.6
71.5
84.4
2010
71,980
80,341
28.5
15.7
71.5
84.3
2011
72,976
80,503
28.3
15.2
71.7
84.8
2012
74,051
82,143
28.5
15.5
71.5
84.5
2013
74,397
82,590
28.2
14.5
71.8
85.5
2014
68,613
77,692
25.8
12.7
74.2
87.3
2015
69,703
79,131
25.2
14.1
74.8
87.6
2016
70,868
80,569
24.9
12.4
75.1
87.6
2017
70,840
80,877
24.8
12.2
76.8
88.5




Comments

  1. Your Table 1 2007 % for women is not adding up. Maybe 25.4% instead?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks Lisa. I'm glad you caught that. Some of the rounding throws out the numbering, but that was a typo. Cheers.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Women Mayors in Ontario

 Recently, I've been up-dating the information on women councillors in Ontario. The following table lists the women elected Mayors in the municipal elections held in October 2022. The list is organized in order of descending population of the municipality. It notes whether the Mayor is an incumbent or newly elected, while new position indicates that the Mayor is new to the position, but was an already incumbent member of council.  Of the 417 Ontario Councils which held elections, 101 are now led by women. (There maybe a few I've missed, as I have not included Reeves.) Mayor Incumbent or New Municipality Pop Acclaimed Bonnie Crombie incumbent Mississauga 717,961 Andrea Horwath new Hamilton 569,353 Marianne Meed Ward incumbent Burlington 186,948 Elizabeth Roy new position ...

The State of Gender Parity in 2019

On December 16, the World Economic Forum (WEF) released its Global Gender Index for 2020 based on 2019 country performance. Canada has dropped 3 places in the ranking since the last report a year ago.  Since 2006 the WEF has produced annual reports on the progress made toward gender equality using benchmarks based on four thematic dimensions: economic participation and opportunity, educational attainment, health and survival, and political empowerment. In the latest edition of Women, Politics and Public Policy: The political struggles of Canadian women, (Newman, White and Findlay, 2020, p. 389) we had this to say of the 2017 report:  According to the 2017 report, no country has fully closed its gender gap; four of the five Nordic countries, Rwanda (4th), and Nicaragua (6th) have closed more than 80 per cent of their gaps. And Canada? Canada does not crack the top ten; it ranks 16th out of 144 countries, which is 2 points lower than its first ranking in 2006. This d...

Is Low Voter Turnout Actually A Good Thing?

 [It's a provocative position. I hope my answer is a bit more nuanced. Thinking with a pen, so the views are my own and likely to change as I think about it a bit more.] The big talking point regarding yesterday's municipal election in London is the free fall debacle in voter turnout. Only 25.5% of eligible voters cast a ballot, a significant plunge from the 40% turnout in 2018 (the BRT election) and from the 2014 high of 43% (the get rid of Fontana and the Fontana 8 election).  This low turnout is seen as the reason for the rather surprising outcomes in some of the words, namely the defeat of three "incumbents."* Incumbents are considered safe bets because they have name recognition and represent the status quo for voters. Generally, the mass of voters in municipal election have little to guide their votes other than name recognition and a desire not to change things up. However, when that "mass" of voters decides not to show up, that generalized support fo...