Skip to main content

Doesn’t this sound familiar? Maybe we are not ready for electronic vote counting




A news report from CBC at 11:25am June 7, 2018 states,

“Voters at a few polling stations in Toronto, Ottawa and London, Ont., reported problems with new machines being used to check voter lists and tabulate votes on election day.

The glitches were causing long lineups, slowing down the election process, voters said.

There were reports of electronic vote tabulators not working, errors in electronic databases, internet connectivity outages, and staff who were not well versed in the new machines giving long explanations on how to use ballots.”

Does this sound familiar? I posted a blog a day after the New Brunswick provincial election in 2014, called “Panic in the Midnight Hour,” recounting the response to …. breakdown and glitches in the electronic voting machines.

As elections go Monday night was rather exciting not because of some very tight races, but because of the growing hysteria fueled by the on-air media coverage about the tabulation. “Glitches” with the tabulation machinery, “missing” data chips/cards (actually in transit to the central returning office), no one at Elections New Brunswick returning calls, and having to wing-it when you run out of relevant things to say, increased to an on-air panic rife with throw-back comments (“we won’t say this, but oh we are saying it”) about the 2000 U.S. election and Florida. This all peaked between midnight and one in the morning when an on-air personality grilling the head of Elections New Brunswick suggested this was all because some local returning officers had gone home for the night with the data chips and was also part of a conspiracy foisted on New Brunswick by a Toronto computer company that were suspiciously not answering their phones. It seemed lost on this personality that maybe no one was answering calls because they were too busy doing their jobs of tabulating the results and checking for correctness. (This it later turned out included representatives from the Toronto computer company, who were in Fredericton helping to solve the problem and oversee the process. So much for the central Canadian conspiracy). On top of all this, a PC candidate stated lawyers had told him not to concede and then a spokesman (not the leader) from the trailing Progressive Conservative Party announced they were not going to recognize the count unless it was done by hand. 

So much for trying to increase or even maintain public belief in the electoral system and the democratic process. Here’s another nail for democracy’s coffin, i.e., its legitimation crisis. 





According to the CBC, new technology such as e-Poll books and electronic vote tabulators were being used, the electronic vote tabulators having been tested in past Ontario byelections, and one guesses during the New Brunswick election. Most of us are familiar by the rather arcane and random functioning of our computer devices so it’s not a bit surprise the general (as opposed to computer-geek) public hired to work at polling stations are not going to be beset by common problems of program glitches, connectivity problems, and just learning a whole new type of machine. Problems at polling stations included the one at the Eastern Star Temple on Fanshawe Rd. East in London North Centre. According to the article the explanation was, “"It's our first time using these computer systems, so of course there's been a bit of a hiccup…. It is a new technology that we're using, but we've smoothed it out."

Elections Ontario does state that if all fails they would retain the paper ballots and undertake a manual count.

However, as in New Brunswick in this doesn’t help in the maintenance of public belief in the electoral system and the democratic process. As the CBC report, quoting a voter in Tillsonburg, concluded, "Oh, it was ridiculous. It was such a mess. … Although I'm a really committed voter, I worry that there's a lot of people that would just say 'oh, forget this.'"




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Women Running in Ontario 2018

I started this blog back in 2014 after the Ontario election by discussing the number of women who ran and their success. This time I'm ahead o the ball, so today I'm giving you the lowdown on how many women are running, for which parties and where. Earlier this week, in honour of Mothers' Day, Andrea Horwath announced that more than 50% of the NDPs candidates were women (69 of 124 or 55.6%) ( http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/ndp-liberals-pcs-women-election-voters-1.4661203 ). She praised the NDP for insuring that gender equity principles are part of the nomination process. To their credit the other mainstream parties have all increased the number of women running, this is even with the addition of 17 new ridings in this election. The percentage of women running for the Liberals has increased by 10% and the Progressive Conservatives have increased their number by 8%. The Greens come closest to the NDP running women in 64 of 125 ridings, according to a count of their w...

This time: Employment Statistics Part Time Full Time Work

The end of term is always a difficult time to get any writing done, which is a problem because I'm on a deadline. However, I did manage to hive off a little time from marking and dealing with student queries to compile the following statistics on Part Time and Full Time work and how it is distributed by gender. This is drawn from Statistics Canada Labour Force Survey characteristics and the U.S Bureau of Labor, Labour Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey. It's for a piece I'm working on about the gendered nature of work in Canada and the U.S. Table 1. Canada Female and Male Employment F ull Time and Part Time Percentage of working population by gender Years Employment total (thousands) Part Time Full Time Female Male Female Male Female Male 2007 7477.7 8185.6 25.4 10.1 74.6 90.0 2008 7541.1 8254.8 25.6 10.4 74.4 90.0...

Hillary Clinton – An unreliable victim of rape culture

A few weeks ago, I re-posted an article about how this year’s American Presidential election was a referendum on male entitlement. Well we now have our answer. While Clinton ‘won’ the popular vote, the low turnout of democratic voters, the overall vote in the mid-west and industrial swing states, and the willingness of a substantial number of women (42% of women voters according to the Pew Research Center Facttank) who voted for Trump indicates a significant plurality of American voters are comfortable enough with male entitlement to support a man who has historically and consistently imposed himself on women’s bodies without their consent. This raises the question of why a substantial portion of a society is willing to accept a rapist and serial sexual abuser in the highest office over a woman career politician. Part of the explanation certainly is the prevalence of a rape culture in the United States. Wikipedia is quite clear in its definition of rape culture; “a setting in w...